United States v. Lonny Eugene Hadley

Good Law
977 F.2d 592·1992 WL 239029·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 36113
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 199291-10198California833 words

Opinion

Opinion

977 F.2d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lonny Eugene HADLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10198. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 22, 1992. * Decided Sept. 28, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lonny Eugene Hadley appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines"), following a guilty plea, for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Hadley contends that the district court erred by considering the manufacture of additional methamphetamine as relevant conduct pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the legality of a sentence. United States v. Fine, No. 90-50280, slip op. 11067, 11073 (9th Cir. September 14, 1992)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.