United States v. Anthony R. Ford

977 F.2d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony R. FORD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10097. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 27, 1992. * Decided Oct. 8, 1992. Before CHOY, SNEED and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Anthony Ford is challenging his classification by the district court as a career offender under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Mr. Ford claims that the two convictions used to classify him as a career offender in the sentencing phase of the present armed robbery conviction should be considered related, and therefore do not support career offender status. 3 We affirm the district court's classification. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW 4 Appellant Anthony Ford entered a guilty plea to one count of armed bank robbery pursuant to a written plea agreement. In the Presentencing Report, the probation officer concluded that the appellant's two…