United States v. Rafael Bejar-Acosta

977 F.2d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael BEJAR-ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10543. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. * Decided Sept. 30, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rafael Bejar-Acosta appeals the judgment and sentence imposed following his entry of a guilty plea to one count of being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . 3 Counsel for Bejar-Acosta filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified one possible issue for review: whether defendant understood the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 4 Following review of the record on appeal, we find that defendant did understand the Sentencing Guidelines. The record reflects that defendant understood the increase in the…