United States v. Josephine Flores

977 F.2d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Josephine FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50249. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 17, 1992. * Decided Oct. 7, 1992. Before WIGGINS, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Flores pled guilty to conspiracy to bribe a public official in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , and aiding and abetting the bribery of a public official in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201 (b)(2). She appeals her sentence on the ground that the district court applied the wrong guideline. The government argues that Flores waived her right to appeal her sentence in her plea bargain. We agree and affirm. 3 A defendant may waive her right to appeal a sentence determined under the Guidelines. United States v. Bolinger, 940 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir.1991). We review whether the defendant waived the right to appeal de novo. Id. at 479 . The relevant…