United States v. Brenda Elizabeth Holloway

977 F.2d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brenda Elizabeth HOLLOWAY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50669. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 8, 1992. * Decided Oct. 22, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Brenda Elizabeth Holloway appeals her sentence under the November 1, 1990 version of the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines") following a guilty plea to forgery within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 13 and Cal.Penal Code § 470. Holloway contends that the district court erred by (1) increasing her base offense level for more than minimal planning pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(2)(A); (2) denying a reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a); and (3) counting three prior convictions separately when calculating…