United States v. Earl Emanuel Lovelace

977 F.2d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl Emanuel LOVELACE, Defendant-Appellant, No. 91-50830. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 19, 1992. * Decided Oct. 15, 1992. 1 Before TANG and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges and WALKER, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 On November 12, 1991, Earl Emanuel Lovelace was convicted following his conditional guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). Having preserved his right to do so, he timely appeals the district court's refusal to suppress evidence obtained at the time of his arrest. FACTS 4 Lovelace was arrested on October 4, 1989 at an apartment in San Diego pursuant to a parole violation warrant issued two days earlier by the United States Parole Commission. Along with U.S. Marshals from San Diego, the cadre of arresting officers included Detective Henry Kozen of the…