United States v. Kenneth Walter Kinch, Jr.

977 F.2d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Walter KINCH, JR., Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50832. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 22, 1992. * Decided Sept. 28, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kinch appeals his sentence upon his guilty plea to conspiracy to launder money derived from drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1957(a), and 31 U.S.C. §§ 5322 (a) and 5324(3). He contends that the trial court erred by not reducing his base offense level for acceptance of responsibility. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1294 (1). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 Kinch first claims that the district court made inadequate findings in denying him a two-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility. He…