United States v. Philip Walsh

977 F.2d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip WALSH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10474. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1992. * Decided Oct. 14, 1992. Before FARRIS, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Because the court has decided this case on the merits, defendant-appellant's motion for a temporary remand to the district court is denied as moot. The mandate shall issue forthwith. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Philip Walsh appeals pro se from his guilty plea conviction and sentence on two counts of using a telephone to purchase cocaine with the intent to distribute it ( 21 U.S.C. § 843 (b)) and of conspiring to evade currency transaction reporting requirements ( 18 U.S.C. § 371 ). Walsh argues, inter alia, that the district court erred by finding that he had violated the terms of his plea agreement and by denying Walsh's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We reject…