Andre Brigham Young v. John A. Rorem, Personal Representative for the Estate of Paul J. Narigi Loriana Narigi

977 F.2d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Andre Brigham YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John A. ROREM, Personal Representative for the Estate of Paul J. Narigi; Loriana Narigi, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35962. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 5, 1992. * Decided Oct. 19, 1992. Before CHOY, SNEED and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The district court dismissed Andre Brigham Young's civil rights action because it determined that his claims were time-barred. Young argues that his complaint "related back" to an earlier case, and alternatively, that the statute of limitations was tolled. We reject these arguments, and we affirm. 3 Young filed this pro se action in 1989 against Paul J. Narigi, an attorney who represented Young in criminal matters in 1962 and 1963. Young's previous action against Narigi was dismissed in 1979 for failure to state a claim and for lack of jurisdiction. Young's current action cannot "relate…