United States v. Patrick Russell Wayne
Opinion
Opinion
977 F.2d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Russell WAYNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10547. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. Decided Oct. 22, 1992. Before CHOY, ALARCON and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Patrick Russell Wayne appeals his conviction on one count of possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1) and his sentence of 15 years imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e). The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231 , and this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 . We affirm. 3 * We first consider whether the district court erred in denying Wayne's motion to suppress evidence. We review the district court's denial of a suppression motion de novo. United States v. Limatoc, 807 F.2d 792, 794 (9th Cir.1987) (citing United States v.…