Darrell Woods v. Carl Zenon, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution

977 F.2d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darrell WOODS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-36244. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 22, 1992. * Decided Sept. 29, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darrell Woods, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. We review de novo, Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm. 3 Woods raised four grounds for federal habeas corpus relief. He claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective because he: 4 1) failed to move for a severance of Woods's case from that of his codefendants, 5 2) failed to move for the suppression of identification evidence, 6 3) failed to properly cross-examine one of the state's witnesses, and 7 4) failed to file a timely notice of…