United States v. Anuar Morales

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 14316·977 F.2d 1330·1992 WL 296075·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 26681·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8646
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 199291-50272California732 words

Opinion

Opinion

Anuar Morales appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines, following a plea of guilty, for conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. Morales contends that the district court erred by adjusting his offense level under Guidelines section 3C1.1 for obstruction of justice rather than sentencing him for the separate offense of contempt for his failure to testify against a co-conspirator. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Generally, we review for clear error the district court’s finding that a defendant obstructed justice. United States v. Mondello, 927 F.2d 1463, 1465 (9th Cir.1991). Nevertheless, we review de novo whether a defendant’s conduct constitutes obstruction of justice under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. United States v. Rodriguez-Razo, 962 F.2d 1418, 1420 (9th Cir.1992).

Section 3C1.1 provides that “[i]f the defendant willfully obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the administration of justice during the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense, increase the offense level by 2 levels.” United States Sentencing Commission,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.