Clay Tower Apartments v. Kemp

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 14066·978 F.2d 478·1992 WL 280639·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 25764
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 199291-35370California1,828 words

Opinion

Opinion

978 F.2d 478 CLAY TOWER APARTMENTS, Oregon general partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Harold Schnitzer, et al., Plaintiff, v. Jack KEMP, Sec. HUD, Secretary of U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-35370. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 19, 1992. Decided Oct. 14, 1992. Jacob Tanzer, Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellant. Jeffrica Jenkins Lee, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. BEEZER, Circuit Judge: 1 An Oregon owner of low-income housing brought a declaratory judgment action against the United States Department of Housing & Urban Development [HUD] challenging HUD's determination that the expiration of a ten-year real property tax abatement on a "Section 8" housing project was not a basis for a special rent adjustment under 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(c)(2)(B) (1988). The partnership appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in HUD's favor. We reverse and remand. 2 * In 1980, Clay Tower Apartments,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.