United States v. Fredrick Garcia-Cruz

Caution
92 Daily Journal DAR 14748·978 F.2d 537·978 F.3d 537·1992 WL 311248·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28073
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 30, 199291-50758California2,725 words

Opinion

Opinion

Farris, J.

Fredrick Garcia-Cruz appeals his jury conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g) (1988), and his sentence imposed under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e) (1988). Cruz argues that his conviction should be reversed because the district court erred in: (1) refusing his proffered jury instruction on constructive possession; (2) failing to hold a Franks hearing and failing to suppress evidence seized during a search of Cruz’s residence; (3) admitting statements made by Cruz allegedly after his invocation of the right to remain silent; (4) denying Cruz’s acquittal motion. Cruz also argues that sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act was improper because his pri- or conviction as a felon in possession was not a “violent felony” under the Act. We affirm Cruz’s conviction but vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

San Diego Police, along with a California State Parole officer, searched Cruz’s residence on December 23, 1988. The search was conducted pursuant to both a state search warrant and the search and seizure conditions of Cruz’s state parole. Cruz was arrested after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.