United States v. Cassius L. Chinske

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 14862·978 F.2d 557·978 F.3d 557·1992 WL 314213·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28354
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 199291-30378California1,013 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wright, J.

Cassius Chinske pleaded guilty to maintaining a residence for the cultivation of marijuana, a class C felony. The court sentenced him to 15 months imprisonment followed by two years of supervised release. The court also ordered him to pay a fine of $2,760 to cover the cost of his supervised release. He appeals the term of supervised release and the fine.

I

Chinske argues that the Sentencing Guidelines, which impose a mandatory term of supervised release, conflict with the Sentencing Reform Act, which permits an optional term. U.S.S.G. §§ 5D1.1 and 5D1.2; 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (a). He contends that this alleged inconsistency renders these Guidelines invalid because 28 U.S.C. § 994 (b) requires that all Guidelines be consistent with Title 18, United States Code.

The statute allows a court to include as part of the sentence a requirement that the defendant be placed on a term of supervised release. 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (a). The maximum term for a defendant convicted of a Class C or D felony is three years. 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (b)(2).

Under the Guidelines, the court must order a term of supervised release to follow imprisonment when it sentences a defendant to more than one year of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.