Carlos F. Bell v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company J. Michael Calvert

978 F.2d 714 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carlos F. BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY; J. Michael Calvert, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55410. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 22, 1992. * Decided Oct. 28, 1992. Before SNEED, BEEZER and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Carlos Bell appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action on res judicata grounds and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 * Background 4 In his complaint, Bell contends that the defendants conspired with his previous attorney to pay him less than the minimum wage established by the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206 (a). 1 Bell also appears to allege that his attorney committed malpractice in his unemployment and workers compensation case and that the defendants stole his personal property. 5 Prior to bringing his…