Burlison v. Burlison

978 F.2d 714 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Terry A. BURLISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sherry L. BURLISON; Charles W. Talbot; Pierce County; Thomas Swayze, Superior Ct. Judge, Judge, Superior Court; James M. Marshall, Commissioner, Court Commissioner; Paul M. Boyle, Commissioner, Court Commissioner, etc., et al.; State of Washington, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35262. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 6, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Terry A. Burlison appeals pro se the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging a Washington State Superior Court marital dissolution and child custody determination. The district court found that abstention principles required dismissal of the action because Burlison's civil rights claims would require the court to review a state court judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we…