In Re Emanuel M. Comora, Debtor. Emanuel M. Comora v. David Radell Irvin Radell Nancy Radell Mary Radell

978 F.2d 714 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Emanuel M. COMORA, Debtor. Emanuel M. COMORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David RADELL; Irvin Radell; Nancy Radell; Mary Radell, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56089. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 22, 1992. * Decided Oct. 28, 1992. Before SNEED, BEEZER, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Emanuel Comora appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of Comora's appeal from the bankruptcy court's orders denying Comora's motion to disqualify the bankruptcy court judge and denying Comora's motion to dismiss the adversary proceeding. The district court dismissed Comora's appeal because it found the bankruptcy court's orders were not final, appealable orders. We lack jurisdiction over Comora's appeal. 3 "Interlocutory orders [of the bankruptcy court] are not appealable as of right. They may be reviewed at the discretion of the district courts, 28 U.S.C. § 158 (a), but…