Frost v. Agnos

978 F.2d 715 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond Ludwig FROST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas AGNOS, Sheriff, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office; David Alster, Jail Commander, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office; Mr. Seeverson, Detention Bureau Commander, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15803. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 22, 1992. * Decided Oct. 26, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond Ludwig Frost, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action alleging that prison officials violated his first amendment right to free exercise of his religion by prohibiting him from attending congregate religious services. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Frost is a close custody inmate in the Maricopa County Jail…