Milton G. Pace, Claimant-Appellant v. Norma J. Hurt, Debtor-Appellee

978 F.2d 715 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Milton G. PACE, Claimant-Appellant, v. Norma J. HURT, Debtor-Appellee. No. 91-16364. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 22, 1992. * Decided Nov. 2, 1992. Before SNEED, BEEZER and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Milton G. Pace appeals pro se the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's decision sustaining Chapter 11 debtor and Pace's ex-wife, Norma J. Hurt's objection to Pace's claim and dismissing the claim with prejudice. Pace claimed that Hurt was jointly liable with him for certain default judgments obtained against him following the dissolution of their marriage. Pace contends that the district court erred by finding that the bankruptcy court had jurisdiction to sustain debtor Hurt's objection to Pace's claim because the validity of the claim is pending on appeal from an adversary proceeding in which Pace's claims against Hurt were dismissed. We have…