Melvin G. Hickman v. Los Angeles Unified School District Bierly & Associates

978 F.2d 715 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Melvin G. HICKMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; Bierly & Associates, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-56183. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Oct. 16, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Melvin G. Hickman appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 action against the Los Angeles Unified School District and several other defendants alleging violations of his procedural due process rights throughout his workers' compensation proceedings litigated in California state courts. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Tanner v. Heise, 879 F.2d 572, 576 (9th Cir.1989). All…