Kaffenberger v. City of Bullhead City, Ariz.

978 F.2d 715 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard E. KAFFENBERGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF BULLHEAD CITY, ARIZONA, an Incorporated Arizona City; Steven R. Buck, Member of City Council; Husband to Doris Anne Buck; John L. Day, Member of City Council; Husband to E. Darlene Day; Dean Hackett, Member of City Council; husband; Martin Kooken, Member of City Council; Husband to Barbara; Robert C. Rogge, Member of City Council; Husband to Cecile P.; Glen E. Tudor, Member of City Council, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16368. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Oct. 16, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Former Bullhead City Manager Richard E. Kaffenberger appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Bullhead ("City") in his employment discrimination action. He contends that the district court erred by…