In Re Klaus W. Lehmann, Debtor, Klaus W. Lehmann Leonard Thomas Bradt v. Wells Fargo Credit Corporation

978 F.2d 715 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Klaus W. LEHMANN, Debtor, Klaus W. LEHMANN; Leonard Thomas Bradt, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO CREDIT CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 92-15629. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 6, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Klaus W. Lehmann and Leonard T. Bradt, appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") dismissal of their appeal from the bankruptcy court's judgment as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1293 , and we affirm. 3 Timeliness of a notice of appeal is a question of law which we review de novo. In re Kincaid, 917 F.2d 1162, 1164 (9th Cir.1990). 4 The untimely filing of a notice of appeal deprives the BAP of jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Slimick v. Silva (In re Slimick ), 928 F.2d 304, 306 (9th Cir.1990); In re Souza, 795 F.2d 855, 857 (9th Cir.1986). A "notice of appeal shall be filed…