Lanny Ross Moore v. United States

978 F.2d 715 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lanny Ross MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-35039. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 22, 1992. * Decided Oct. 29, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lanny Ross Moore, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his guilty plea. Moore pled guilty to importation of ephedrine and hydriotic acid with intent to manufacture a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 960 (d). Moore contends that (1) the indictment was invalid and (2) his guilty plea did not comport with the requirements of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 * Invalid Indictment 4 Generally, a guilty plea precludes a defendant from raising constitutional…