Allan Miller v. Pamela Iles South Orange County Sml

978 F.2d 715 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Allan MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pamela ILES; South Orange County SML, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 91-55510, 91-55734. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Oct. 16, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Allan Miller appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for two Orange County, California, municipal court judges, and directed verdict for a deputy marshal in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Miller also appeals pro se the district court's award of attorneys' fees and sanctions to the defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 1 3 * Background 4 Miller's section 1983 action arises out of a judgment entered against him in a small claims action he filed in Orange County in October 1986. Miller filed a motion seeking review of…