Jerardo Rodriguez v. James C. Spaulding Van Skike James Blodgett

978 F.2d 715 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerardo RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James C. SPAULDING; Van Skike; James Blodgett, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35085. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 22, 1992. * Decided Oct. 27, 1992. Before SNEED, BEEZER and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerardo Rodriguez, an Oregon state prisoner, 1 appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Washington state prison officials, in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1044 (9th Cir.1989), and affirm. 3 A motion for summary judgment should be affirmed only if the evidence, read in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demonstrates that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter…