United Pacific Ins. Co. v. Safety Kleen Corp.

978 F.2d 716 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, and Chevron U.S.A., Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-16778. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1992. * Decided Oct. 28, 1992. Before FARRIS, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Safety Kleen Corporation appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of United Pacific Insurance Company and Chevron U.S.A. The district court concluded that United Pacific and Chevron had no duty to indemnify or defend Safety Kleen in two underlying state tort actions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We reverse and remand. 3 Safety Kleen argues that the district court erred in concluding that exclusions in United Pacific's policy preclude coverage. The Vendor's Endorsement covering Chevron's…