United States v. Albert Leroy Comstock

978 F.2d 716 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert Leroy COMSTOCK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30384. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 17, 1992. Decided Nov. 2, 1992. Before BEEZER, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Following the district court's denial of his motion to suppress, Albert Comstock conditionally entered a guilty plea to the indictment which charged conspiracy to manufacture and possess marijuana with intent to distribute. On appeal, he argues that the affidavit filed in support of the search warrant did not supply probable cause and that the good faith exception is inapplicable. Because we hold the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding the affidavit established probable cause, we affirm. 3 * In September 1990, the government applied for warrants to search four locations, including 784 Covered Bridge Road, Rogue River, Oregon.…