United States v. Richard R. Harris

978 F.2d 716 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard R. HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50020. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 22, 1992. * Decided Oct. 26, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard R. Harris appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion to correct his sentence. Harris was convicted, following a jury trial, on 32 counts of mail fraud, bank fraud, and interstate transportation of forged securities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 , 1344, and 2314. The district court sentenced Harris to five years imprisonment followed by five years supervised release. Harris contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 35(a) motion. In his motion Harris claimed that his sentence was illegal because: the order of restitution was unconstitutional as…