Robert Arnold Sorensen v. Jack McCormick

978 F.2d 716 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Arnold SORENSEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack McCORMICK, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-36189. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 22, 1992. * Decided Oct. 26, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Arnold Sorenson, a Montana state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his state conviction for misdemeanor marijuana possession, felony marijuana possession, and sale and conspiracy to sell marijuana. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Weygandt v. Ducharme, 774 F.2d 1491, 1492 (9th Cir.1985), and affirm. 3 Sorenson contends that the district court's denial of his habeas petition was improper because the Montana state trial court erred by allowing the testimony of Wayne Wagner, a co-conspirator, into evidence. This contention…