Charles R. Wilcox v. U.S. Parole Commission Larry F. Taylor, Warden

978 F.2d 717 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles R. WILCOX, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION; Larry F. Taylor, Warden, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-55084. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 21, 1992. * Decided Oct. 30, 1992. Before KILKENNY, GOODWIN and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles R. Wilcox appeals pro se from the district court's denial of habeas relief arising out of Wilcox's challenge to the United States Parole Commission's ("Commission") determination of Wilcox's parole severity category based on allegedly erroneous information contained in Wilcox's presentence investigative report ("PSI"). We review de novo, see Tyler v. United States, 929 F.2d 451, 454 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 142 (1991), and we affirm. 3 In a nutshell, Wilcox contends that the Commission arrived at its total loss figure of more than $1 million by improperly considering erroneous information in…