Von Bodungen v. Bank of America
Opinion
Opinion
978 F.2d 717 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frederick VON BODUNGEN; Mary A. Von Bodungen, aka Mary A. Ward; Jean Ward De Velice; Los Amigos Inc., a Nevada corporation and Von Bodungen Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiffs-counter-defendants-Appellants, v. The BANK OF AMERICA, National Trust and Savings Association, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee. No. 90-16357. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1991. Decided Oct. 28, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CV-88-01869-WHO; Claudia Wilken, United States Magistrate, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED. 1 Before FLETCHER, WIGGINS and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Plaintiffs/appellants, Frederick and Mary Von Bodungen, appeal an order of the federal magistrate granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant/counter-claimant, the Bank of America. 1 The Von…