In re Wainscott

Good Law
978 F.2d 717·1992 WL 322065·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 34718
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 199291-56240California355 words

Opinion

Opinion

978 F.2d 717 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Sheila WAINSCOTT, Debtor. Sheila WAINSCOTT, Appellant, v. MARMAG INVESTMENTS; World Savings; J. Dobias; V. Dobias; Nellan's Carpet; Home Savings of America; Great American Bank; Gold Coast Investments, Appellees. No. 91-56240. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 6, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sheila Wainscott appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's order dismissing her appeal of a bankruptcy court order as untimely. We dismiss the appeal as moot. 3 In January 1991, the property at the center of this appeal was sold at a trustee's sale to Marmag Investments, one of Wainscott's creditors and a party to this appeal. 1 Wainscott no longer has a right of redemption in the property. Nor is there anything in the record to suggest that the sale could otherwise be set aside under state law. This appeal is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.