United States v. James Lewis Savage

Good Law
978 F.2d 717·1992 WL 317209·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 34711
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 199291-50490California1,250 words

Opinion

Opinion

978 F.2d 717 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Lewis SAVAGE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50490. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 8, 1992. Decided Nov. 3, 1992. Before POOLE, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant James Lewis Savage appeals his conviction by conditional guilty plea to armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a) and (d), and his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines. Savage presents three arguments: (1) the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained in conjunction with a warrantless arrest because the police lacked probable cause to arrest him; (2) the district court erred in denying his motion to compel the Government to perform according to a plea agreement which the Government withdrew before Savage entered his conditional plea; and (3) the district court erred…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.