United States v. John Anthony Soto, United States of America v. Emanuel Garcia, Jr., United States of America v. Edward H. Subia

978 F.2d 717 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Anthony SOTO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emanuel GARCIA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward H. SUBIA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-10525, 91-10526 and 91-10625. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 5, 1992. * Decided Oct. 30, 1992. Before O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and VAN SICKLE, ** District Judge MEMORANDUM *** John Anthony Soto, Emanuel Garcia, Jr., and Edward H. Subia appeal their convictions for armed robbery of a credit union under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a), (d). All three allege the jury was improperly instructed on flight. Soto and Subia deny they obstructed the administration of justice. Garcia and Subia argue the district court ignored their objections to statements contained in the presentence reports. We affirm. I. FACTS…