Erma Stites v. United States

Good Law
978 F.2d 1091·1992 WL 309196
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 199290-56164California1,124 words

Opinion

Opinion

978 F.2d 1091 70 A.F.T.R.2d 92 -6106, 93-1 USTC P 50,287 Erma STITES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-56164. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 3, 1992. Decided April 1, 1992. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Oct. 28, 1992. A. Lavar Taylor, Busch & Taylor, Irvine, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Shirley D. Peterson, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The panel has voted unanimously to amend the opinion previously issued in this case. The opinion filed April 1, 1992, 960 F.2d 864 , is amended as follows: 2 With that amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. 3 The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and of the proposed amendment to the opinion, and no judge of the court has requested a vote to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35. 4 The petition for rehearing is hereby denied and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.