Holden v. Hagopian

Bad Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 14801·978 F.2d 1115·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28266·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8947
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 199290-15183California4,672 words

Opinion

Opinion

978 F.2d 1115 61 USLW 2348 , Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,049 Thomas HOLDEN; Thomas Nokes; Robert Maier; Steven S. Hallock; Eugene H. Gallagher; Mark Manlove; Warren F. Cappel; Phillips J. Goodenough, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Robert R. HAGOPIAN, an individual; et al., Defendant, and Thomas R. Harnett, an individual; Security Pacific National Bank, a National Association; Graves, Allen, Cornelius & Celestre, a partnership; Losey & Thomson, a partnership; Gery Gomez, Defendants/Appellees. No. 90-15183. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted, July 15, 1992. Submission deferred July 15, 1992. Resubmitted Oct. 26, 1992. Decided Nov. 2, 1992. Stuart A. Knowles, Wilson, Ryan & Campilongo, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Elise M. Pellegrino and Manuel Martinez, Stein, Lubin & Lerner, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee Thomas A. Harnett. David Ian Dalby, Long & Levit, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee Graves, Allen, Cornelius & Celestre. John T. Kinn, Segal & Kirby, Sacramento, Cal., for defendant-appellee Losey and Thomson. Robert A. Padway and Michael R. Simmonds, Broad, Schulz, Larson & Wineberg,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.