Orange Show Lincoln Mercury v. City of San Bernardino

Good Law
978 F.2d 1265·1992 WL 323248·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 34246
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 199291-55798California933 words

Opinion

Opinion

978 F.2d 1265 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. ORANGE SHOW LINCOLN MERCURY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55798. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 9, 1992. Decided Nov. 5, 1992. Before FEINBERG, * GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiffs Orange Show Lincoln Mercury, Timothy L. Woods and William E. Shack, Jr. appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, dismissing their complaint. Their principal claim on appeal is that the district court erred in not allowing them to withdraw certain admissions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 36. I. 3 Plaintiffs initiated this action in January 1988 against the City of San Bernardino and the Redevelopment Agency of San Bernardino (City defendants) and Daniel S. Evans & Associates, the San Bernardino Auto Plaza Association, the Orange Show Plaza…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.