Jose Luna-Flores v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

978 F.2d 1265 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose LUNA-FLORES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70260. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 10, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Luna-Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") decision finding him statutorily ineligible for a section 212(c) waiver of deportation. 1 We review the BIA's dismissal for an abuse of discretion. Baires v. INS, 856 F.2d 89, 91 (9th Cir.1988). We deny the petition for review. 3 Luna-Flores entered the country as a permanent resident alien in 1971, as an immediate relative to his United States citizen spouse. It appears that his wife's marriage was later found to be bigamous, and consequently, the IJ ordered…