Mohammed Baher Elramly v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
978 F.2d 1265·1992 WL 332034·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 34256
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 199292-70220California898 words

Opinion

Opinion

978 F.2d 1265 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mohammed Baher ELRAMLY, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70220. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 10, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mohammed Baher Elramly, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of his appeal for failure to specify adequately the grounds for the appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1 (d)(1-a)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a) and grant the petition for review. 3 * Background 4 Elramly entered the United States in 1976 on a nonimmigrant student visa to study at the University of Michigan. In 1979, Elramly married a United States citizen and became a lawful permanent resident. Elramly was divorced in August 1990 and married another United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.