United States v. All Beneficial Interest in that Certain Installment Note Dated January 12, 1987 in Principal Ammount of $92,500

978 F.2d 1266 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALL BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THAT CERTAIN INSTALLMENT NOTE DATED JANUARY 12, 1987, IN the PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $92,500, Defendant, Michael L. Montalvo, Claimant-Appellant, No. 91-16427. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1992. * Decided Nov. 10, 1992. Before GOODWIN, FARRIS and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael L. Montalvo appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States in a civil in rem forfeiture action against two promissory notes traced to real property purchased with proceeds from drug transactions. Montalvo challenges the judgment on the grounds that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and that this civil forfeiture action is prohibited by the Double Jeopardy Clause. We affirm. I. 3 Montalvo is currently serving a life sentence following a 1989…