Amerco, Inc. Republic Insurance v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 14975·979 F.2d 162·1992 WL 316478·70 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6048·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28748
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 199291-70732California3,553 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fernandez, J.

AMERCO and a number of its subsidiaries (AMERCO Group) purchased insurance policies from Republic Western Insurance Company (Republic) and deducted the pre-: miums for income tax purposes. Republic was a subsidiary of AMERCO. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Commissioner) determined that because of the relationships among the parties the transactions did not constitute insurance. A notice of deficiency was issued by the Commissioner, and AMERCO petitioned the Tax Court for a redetermination. The Tax Court found that the transactions were insurance. It, therefore, held against the Commissioner, who now appeals. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The AMERCO Group constitutes the U-Haul system. AMERCO itself is a holding company which owns the stock of a number of subsidiaries. Among those subsidiaries are U-Haul International, Inc., the administrative clearing house, AMERCO Lease Co., which owns much of the U-Haul rental equipment, and numerous other rental companies, repair shops, manufacturing companies and service companies. Approximately 250 of these joined in AMERCO’s consolidated returns for the tax years in question — 1979-85.

Republic was incorporated in 1973. It is a third tier…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.