United States v. Gregory Thompson, AKA Scott Wade Morgan

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 15090·979 F.2d 743·1992 WL 319667·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29007·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9111
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 9, 199292-10205California1,421 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boochever, J.

Gregory Thompson appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(a). Thompson contends that when his sentence was changed from five years imprisonment and five years special parole to two years imprisonment and eight years special parole, the increase in the special parole term was illegal. He also argues that the modified sentence is invalid because he was not personally present when his sentence was changed. Because we conclude that Thompson’s sentence was reduced, it was not illegal and his presence was not required. Accordingly, we affirm.

I

On May 21, 1986, Gregory Thompson pleaded guilty to a charge of importing 480 pounds of marijuana into the United States from the Republic of Mexico in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 . He was sentenced to five years imprisonment and a special parole term of five years. He did not appeal his conviction or sentence, and he began serving his sentence on December 1, 1986.

On February 9, 1987, Thompson filed a motion for reduction of his sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b), which at the time provided that a defendant could move to reduce his sentence within 120 days…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.