Shelton R. Thomas v. Bob Goldsmith

Bad Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 15148·979 F.2d 746·1992 WL 321267·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29281·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9142
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 199291-16012California2,001 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Shelton R. Thomas, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

I. FACTS

Thomas was convicted in 1981 in Arizona state court of four counts of sexual assault and one count of burglary. Before trial, his counsel requested a hearing on the vol-untariness of certain of Thomas’ statements to the police. His attorney later abandoned the argument that the statements were not voluntary, and instead, asked that the hearing be held for the sole purpose of establishing what Thomas had said to the police. This request was granted. Thomas was not present when the first two officers were questioned, but at the suggestion of his counsel, was brought to the courtroom for the third officer’s testimony.

At trial, Thomas contended for the first time that he had been at a movie theater when the crimes took place. The state had not previously known that he would offer this alibi. The morning after Thomas testified, the state disclosed that it would call the theater manager in rebuttal. The trial judge allowed the rebuttal testimony but required that defense counsel be allowed to interview…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.