In Re All Terrain Vehicle Litigation.

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 15142·979 F.2d 755·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29565·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9141
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 199291-55475California1,487 words

Opinion

Opinion

979 F.2d 755 In re ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE LITIGATION. Michael REINHEIMER; Wesley Weir; Michael Schwartzberger; Joseph Sposato; Robert Abers; Arthur Ingraham; Sylvia Grunor; Fred Booth, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HONDA MOTOR CO. LTD., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55475. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 8, 1992. Decided Nov. 10, 1992. David H. Weinstein, Kohn, Savett, Klein & Graf, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs-appellants. Howard P. Willens, Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: BROWNING and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, GEORGE, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Plaintiffs, a class of owners of three wheel all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), filed several separate suits in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against the Specialty Vehicle Industry Association of America and several manufacturers and distributors of ATVs. 1 Plaintiffs claimed ATVs are inherently dangerous and sought compensation for their economic loss under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (RICO); the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2051 et seq.;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.