Danjaq, S.A. v. Pathe Communications Corporation Mgm-Pathe Communications Co. Tracinda Corporation Kirk Kerkorian Mgm/ua Communications Co.
Opinion
Opinion
Schroeder, J.
This appeal involves two arcane issues of subject matter jurisdiction that are of first impression in this Circuit. Both issues relate to the determination of a corporation’s principal place.of business for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. The first is whether alien corporations are subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (c), which states that a corporation is a citizen both of its place of incorporation and the location of its principal place of business. We agree with the district court that an alien corporation, like a domestic corporation, is a citizen of both.
The second issue is whether the activities of a subsidiary corporation — not a party to the litigation — should be considered to determine the principal place of business of the parent. We hold that a subsidiary’s activities should not be considered for this purpose, at least absent a showing that the subsidiary is merely an alter ego of its parent.
The final issue is to determine the principal place of business of Plaintiff-Appellant Danjaq, S.A., a Swiss corporation. We conclude the district court correctly determined that place to be California, where appellant’s business activities are conducted. Switzerland, where the…