Dinesh Maniar v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 15323·979 F.2d 782·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29930·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9215
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 199290-16252California2,350 words

Opinion

Opinion

979 F.2d 782 61 USLW 2321 Dinesh MANIAR; Amphora Wine Company, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Valley State Bank; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its separate corporate capacity, Defendants-Appellants, and Capital Bank of California, a California Corporation; Jules Huppert, Individually; William William Jacoby, Inc., a California Corporation; Sacco Insurance Company, a California Corporation; Title Trust Deed Service Company, Inc., a California Corporation, Defendants. No. 90-16252. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 17, 1992. Decided Nov. 16, 1992. Daniel H. Kurtenbach, F.D.I.C., Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellants. James M. Hanavan, Diane R. Crowley, Gordon & Rees, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: ALARCON, BOOCHEVER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge: 1 The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") appeals the district court's order remanding this case to state court. The FDIC argues that the district court lacked the authority to remand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.