Tyrone Goodwin v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
979 F.2d 854·1992 WL 337118·157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2896·300 NLRB No. 780·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35737
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 199291-70216California3,506 words

Opinion

Opinion

979 F.2d 854 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tyrone GOODWIN, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 91-70216. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 8, 1992. * Decided Nov. 16, 1992. 1 Before JAMES R. BROWNING and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE ** , District Judge. 2 Tyrone Goodwin appeals the National Labor Relations Board's ("the Board") decision dismissing his unfair labor practice complaint. Goodwin claimed his discharge violated sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act ("the Act"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158 (a)(1), (3). The Board deferred to an arbitration award which found that Goodwin had been discharged for cause. We have jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f). We affirm. FACTS 3 Goodwin worked in the composites department of Teledyne Industries, Inc ("Teledyne"). He was also an area shop steward for United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.