Mitchell Harris v. William Henry

979 F.2d 854 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mitchell HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William HENRY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15146. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 16, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mitchell Harris, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He contends that the district court erred by: (1) dismissing his complaint as time barred by the two year statute of limitations, (2) dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim against defendants Frank, Zaic, and Martin, and (3) denying his motion to disqualify the district attorney's office as defense counsel. 3 Harris claims that several members of the Las Vegas Police Department, the public defender who represented him at his state trial, and the district attorney's office conspired to deprive him of his…