Louise Curtis v. Airport Authority of Washoe County

979 F.2d 854 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louise CURTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF WASHOE COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16345. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1992. * Decided Nov. 20, 1992. Before GOODWIN, FARRIS and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 In this action arising under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e), Louise Curtis appeals the denial of her motion for relief under Rule 60(b) from the district court's dismissal of her pendent state law claims. After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment against Curtis on her Title VII claim and dismissed without prejudice her pendent state law claims for wrongful termination in violation of public policy and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We dismiss the appeal and impose sanctions on Curtis of $500.00. DISCUSSION 3 Curtis did not appeal the judgment dismissing her pendent state law…